PRS S2 Standard 24 Review: Complete Analysis
Sooner or later, anyone who's even slightly familiar with the world of electric guitars finds themselves with a nagging thought: "I want a PRS." It's not just a brand, it's a philosophy. But let's face it, the Core Series price tag, the ones that make you dream with their figured tops and museum-quality finishes, often puts you off dreaming and brings you back down to earth—or, rather, into the garage. Your wallet is crying, and your wife (or mortgage) looks askance.
And this is where the PRS S2 Standard 24. It's Paul Reed Smith's answer to those who want a piece of Stevensville, Maryland, without having to mortgage their house. But is it a "real" PRS? Does it work? Is it worth the money? These are the questions I asked myself, and the ones you're probably asking yourself too, if you're here. I got my hands on several examples of this guitar, took it apart, adjusted it, and listened to a fair amount of feedback. Let's see what I came up with.
The question is always the same: you want that mix of playability, tonal versatility and build quality that PRS is famous for, but on a budget that doesn't force you to eat plain pasta for the next six months. PRS S2 Standard 24 It presents itself as a middle ground, somewhere between the affordable (but excellent) Asian-made SEs and the stratospheric Cores. Is it a compromise? Sure. But is it a good compromise? That's the crux of the matter.
When it comes to guitars, especially at these price points, you're not just buying wood and hardware. You're buying an experience, a sound, a feel under your fingers. And you're buying the peace of mind that if something goes wrong, it's not the guitar's fault, but yours. I've seen plenty of "budget" guitars that, with a little tweaking, can sound amazing. But with a PRS S2, you should already have a solid foundation. Let's see if that's the case.
Technical Features: What's Under the Hood?
.biafax-photo-grid { display: grid !important; gap: 12px; margin: 24px 0; }
.biafax-photo-grid-3v { grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr) !important; }
.biafax-photo-grid-2h { grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr) !important; }
.biafax-photo-grid a { display: block; overflow: hidden; border-radius: 6px; line-height: 0; }
.biafax-photo-grid img { width: 100%; height: 100%; object-fit: cover; aspect ratio: 4 / 3; transition: transform 0.3s ease; }
.biafax-photo-grid a:hover img { transform: scale(1.03); }
.biafax-photo-grid br { display: none; }
.biafax-photo-grid-caption { text-align: center; font-style: italic; color: #555; margin: -12px 0 24px; }
.biafax-lightbox-overlay { position: fixed; inset: 0; background: rgba(0,0,0,0.92); display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; z-index: 99999; cursor: zoom-out; }
.biafax-lightbox-overlay img { max-width: 92vw; max-height: 92vh; object-fit: contain; border-radius: 4px; }
@media (max-width: 768px) {
.biafax-photo-grid-3v { grid-template-columns: 1fr !important; }
.biafax-photo-grid-2h { grid-template-columns: 1fr !important; }
}
(function() {
if (window.biafaxGridLightbox) return;
window.biafaxGridLightbox = true;
document.addEventListener(‘click’, function(e) {
var a = e.target.closest(‘a[data-lightbox]’);
if (!a) return;
e.preventDefault();
var overlay = document.createElement(‘div’);
overlay.className = 'biafax-lightbox-overlay';
overlay.innerHTML = '‘‘';
document.body.appendChild(overlay);
overlay.addEventListener(‘click’, function() { overlay.remove(); });
document.addEventListener(‘keydown’, function handler(ev) {
if (ev.key === 'Escape') { overlay.remove(); document.removeEventListener('keydown', handler); }
});
});
})();
In this gallery: PRS, paint job, headstock and body.
.biafax-photo-grid { display: grid !important; gap: 12px; margin: 24px 0; }
.biafax-photo-grid-3v { grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr) !important; }
.biafax-photo-grid-2h { grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr) !important; }
.biafax-photo-grid a { display: block; overflow: hidden; border-radius: 6px; line-height: 0; }
.biafax-photo-grid img { width: 100%; height: 100%; object-fit: cover; aspect ratio: 4 / 3; transition: transform 0.3s ease; }
.biafax-photo-grid a:hover img { transform: scale(1.03); }
.biafax-photo-grid br { display: none; }
.biafax-photo-grid-caption { text-align: center; font-style: italic; color: #555; margin: -12px 0 24px; }
.biafax-lightbox-overlay { position: fixed; inset: 0; background: rgba(0,0,0,0.92); display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; z-index: 99999; cursor: zoom-out; }
.biafax-lightbox-overlay img { max-width: 92vw; max-height: 92vh; object-fit: contain; border-radius: 4px; }
@media (max-width: 768px) {
.biafax-photo-grid-3v { grid-template-columns: 1fr !important; }
.biafax-photo-grid-2h { grid-template-columns: 1fr !important; }
}
(function() {
if (window.biafaxGridLightbox) return;
window.biafaxGridLightbox = true;
document.addEventListener(‘click’, function(e) {
var a = e.target.closest(‘a[data-lightbox]’);
if (!a) return;
e.preventDefault();
var overlay = document.createElement(‘div’);
overlay.className = 'biafax-lightbox-overlay';
overlay.innerHTML = '‘‘';
document.body.appendChild(overlay);
overlay.addEventListener(‘click’, function() { overlay.remove(); });
document.addEventListener(‘keydown’, function handler(ev) {
if (ev.key === 'Escape') { overlay.remove(); document.removeEventListener('keydown', handler); }
});
});
})();
Okay, the specs on paper are one thing. But then there's the reality of the field, the one made up of rehearsals in the rehearsal room, live performances, and sleepless nights tinkering with the amp. I've spent hours on forums, Facebook groups dedicated to PRS, reading reviews and talking to those who... PRS S2 Standard 24 He bought it, played it, and maybe even resold it. And the picture that emerges is pretty clear, with some solid points and a few minor complaints.
The first thing that catches the eye is the almost unanimous agreement on the build quality. "It's a PRS made in the USA, you can feel it" is a phrase you read and hear often. The precision of the fits, the attention to the finish (even if simpler), and the feeling of robustness are consistently praised. Many call it a "workhorse," a battle-ready guitar, reliable and ready for anything. It's not a guitar to hang on the wall and stare at, it's made to be played.
Playability is another strong point. The Pattern Thin neck, with its 25" scale, is almost universally praised for its speed and comfort. Those coming from Fender or Gibson will adapt quickly, finding a good compromise between the two. The 24 frets are a nice plus for those who like to play beyond the 22nd, and access to the upper frets is excellent thanks to the deep cutaway. The PRS tremolo, then, is a gem: it holds tuning like few other non-locking bridges, and is smooth and precise in use.
But let's get to the "buts." The most discussed, and sometimes criticized, point concerns the PRS 85/15 "S" pickups. Don't get me wrong, they're not "bad" pickups. In fact, they're extremely versatile, clean, and balanced. For many, they're fine as is, offering a wide range of sounds thanks to the coil split. However, some in the community find them a bit "generic" or "sterile" compared to the Core Series pickups. They perhaps lack that unique character, that "voice" that boutique pickups or the more expensive Core Series ones manage to express. Some describe them as "very good, but not exceptional." It's a matter of nuance, of course, but for those looking for a very specific sound, they could be the first item to consider for an upgrade.
Aesthetics is another point of discussion. The PRS S2 Standard 24 It's a simple, elegant guitar, but without the opulence of the Core Series. It doesn't have a figured top, nor does it have the spectacular flamework. For some, this is a plus, a return to sobriety that highlights the substance. For others, it lacks that "wow factor" expected from a PRS. It's a matter of personal taste, of course. The V12 finish, while technically excellent and durable, lacks the charm of pure nitrocellulose, which ages with the guitar.
Another consideration that emerges is the comparison with the PRS SE. Many S2 owners say the leap in quality compared to the SE is tangible, especially in playability, wood resonance, and attention to detail. It's not just "Made in USA," it's actually a different feel under the fingers. At the same time, the gap with the Core Series is equally evident, both in terms of the woods selected (especially for the top and fretboard), as well as the higher-end pickups and more luxurious finishes. The S2 positions itself squarely in the middle, aiming to offer the best of both worlds.
Finally, the issue of price. The PRS S2 Standard 24 It's not a cheap guitar. But for many, it represents the most affordable entry point to a true American-made PRS. The quality/price ratio is often considered excellent, especially if you can find it used in good condition. The loss in value on the used market is a bit more pronounced than the Core, but still manageable.
In short, the community sees it as a solid, reliable, well-built, and very playable guitar, with excellent value for money for a US model. The pickups are good but not stellar, and the aesthetics are more sober. It's a guitar for those who want to play, not for those who want to show off. And for me, that's a plus.
PROS and CONS in Relation to Price
When talking about a guitar like the PRS S2 Standard 24, Price is a key factor. We're in a market where significant investments are needed, and every euro must be justified. We're not buying a beginner's guitar, but an instrument that should be with us for years, perhaps on stage or in the studio. Let's analyze the pros and cons of this guitar, comparing them to its cost.
PROS of the PRS S2 Standard 24:
1. Made in USA: This is the first, and perhaps most important, plus. Having a guitar made in the United States, in the same factory as the Core Series, with the same quality standards and expert craftsmanship, is a significant added value. It gives you the assurance of rigorous quality control and attention to detail that is often lacking in mass production. For me, having spent hours fixing minor imperfections on cheaper guitars, this is a relief. Build Quality and Materials: The solid mahogany body and neck, the rosewood fingerboard, and the set neck all contribute to a rich, resonant sound with excellent sustain. The build quality is always impeccable, the frets are well-finished, and the factory setup is generally excellent. It's a sturdy guitar, built to last. Exceptional Playability: The Pattern Thin neck is a delight for those seeking speed and comfort. The 25" scale offers balanced string tension and accurate intonation. The 24 frets and easy access to the high notes make it versatile for any genre. The PRS tremolo is a benchmark for stability and fluidity. This is a guitar that invites you to play.n4. Timbre Versatility: Thanks to the HH configuration and the push/pull coil split on the tone, the PRS S2 Standard 24 It can go from crystal-clear clean sounds to bluesy crunch, all the way to powerful rock and metal distortion. It's not the most "characteristic" guitar in every genre, but it's an exceptional all-rounder, capable of adapting to almost any situation.n5. Value for money (for a US): Compared to the Core Series, the S2 offers a near-complete PRS experience at a significantly lower price. It's a way to enter the world of PRS USA without breaking the bank. For many, it's the best compromise on the market for a guitar at this level. Quality Hardware: PRS locking tuners and a proprietary tremolo bridge are high-quality components that ensure tuning stability and reliability. These are important details, and they contribute to the premium experience.
CONS of the PRS S2 Standard 24:
1. The 85/15 “S” Pickups: As mentioned, they're the most controversial point. While they're good and versatile, they sometimes lack the "mojo" or "personality" found in Core Series or boutique pickups. For those looking for a very specific sound or unique tonal character, they might be a bit bland. This isn't a flaw, but rather a feature that might require a future upgrade for the more discerning. 2. Simple Aesthetics: The flat-top mahogany body, without a figured maple top, and the more sober finishes (often matte or satin for the neck) lack the visual impact of the Core Series. If you're looking for a PRS that turns heads with its flashy beauty, the S2 Standard 24 might disappoint. It's more of a "substantial" than a "spectacular" guitar.n3. V12 finish: While durable and resonant, it lacks the appeal of pure nitrocellulose, which ages and opens up over time. For purists, this might be a small compromise. However, for most guitarists, its durability and low maintenance are an advantage.n4. Resale Value (Potential): S2s tend to hold less value than Core Series models on the used market. This doesn't mean they depreciate dramatically, but they're not an "investment" like Core Series models, which sometimes appreciate in value. If you plan to resell them soon, you might get back a smaller percentage of the purchase price.n5. Price Still High: Despite being cheaper than the Core, the PRS S2 Standard 24 It remains a mid-to-high-end guitar. For those on a budget, it's still a significant investment, and there are excellent alternatives (even the PRS SE) at lower prices. You need to be sure it's the right guitar for your needs.
In short, the PRS S2 Standard 24 It offers high-end build quality and playability for its price, especially considering it's a US model. The compromises are mostly cosmetic and partly in the pickups, but not in the substance of the instrument. For me, it's a guitar that offers incredible value, as long as you know what you're buying and aren't expecting a Core Series under a different label.
Who Is This Guitar For? And Who Should Avoid It?
Deciding whether an instrument is right for you is always a personal matter. There is no one-size-fits-all guitar. PRS S2 Standard 24, with its unique market positioning, appeals to a very specific audience, but may not be the best choice for others. Let's clarify, as we would do with friends over a beer and a guitar catalog open on the table.
Who is the PRS S2 Standard 24 suitable for:
1. The Demanding Guitarist on a Budget: If you've gotten past the budget guitar phase and are looking for a serious upgrade, a "definitive" or almost definitive guitar, but you can't or don't want to spend the crazy amounts of money on the PRS Core or other boutiques, this S2 Standard 24 It's for you. It offers the performance and build quality of a professional instrument at a more affordable price.n2. For those looking for a “Real” PRS (Made in USA): If “Made in USA” is a deciding factor, and you want to feel that Stevensville sound in your hands without having to sell a kidney, the S2 is the most logical option. It’s your gateway to the world of American PRS.n3. The Stage or Studio Musician Looking for a Reliable Workhorse: This guitar is sturdy, reliable, and versatile. It holds its tune, is comfortable to play for hours, and is suitable for a myriad of genres. It's the ideal instrument for those who need a guitar that always works, without frills, and that can withstand the wear and tear of time and touring. If I had to carry a guitar around for gigs, I'd probably choose this one over a €5,000 model that would give me anxiety every time I hit it. Those who appreciate timbre versatility: With its splittable humbuckers, the PRS S2 Standard 24 It covers an impressive range of sounds. From jazz to blues, from classic rock to hard rock, it can hold its own. If your repertoire is varied and you need a guitar that adapts to everything, without having to switch instruments every three songs, this is an excellent candidate.n5. For those who love quick and comfortable handles: The Pattern Thin profile and 25" scale are a winning combination for those seeking agility and comfort. If you have small hands or simply prefer a slim neck that allows you to move freely on the fretboard, you'll feel right at home.n6. The Hobbyist Who Wants a Solid Foundation for Upgrades: If, like me, you enjoy tinkering with your guitars, the S2 Standard 24 offers an excellent foundation. The mahogany body and neck are high-quality, and if you ever want to swap out the pickups for something more boutique or specialized, you'll already have excellent resonance and stability to work with.
Who should avoid it:
1. The Purist of “Top Figurative” and Aesthetic Luxury: If you want a PRS to have a jaw-dropping flamed or quilted maple top, abalone inlays, and a show-stopping gloss nitro finish, the S2 isn't for you. Its aesthetic is understated, elegant, but not ostentatious. Just don't expect the bling of the Core Series.n2. Those looking for a very specific and distinctive sound (without upgrades): If you already have a specific sound in mind, perhaps very vintage, very aggressive, or with a unique character that the stock pickups can't deliver, and you're not willing to upgrade, you might be a little disappointed. The 85/15 ’S“ pickups are good but neutral.n3. Those on a very tight budget: If your maximum budget is under €1,000-1,200, there are excellent alternatives, even within the PRS catalog (the SE Custom 24, for example), which offer excellent value for money. The S2 is a more significant investment.n4. Who prefers very thick or very thin handles (extreme): If you're used to Gibson '50s-style baseball bat necks or ultra-thin Ibanez Wizard-style profiles, the S2's Thin Pattern might not be a completely satisfying middle ground. Trying it out is essential.n5. For those looking for the “True” Vintage Sound of a Les Paul or Stratocaster: While being versatile, the PRS S2 Standard 24 It has its own distinctive tone, which is a mix between Fender and Gibson influences, but with a PRS character. It won't sound Exactly like a vintage Les Paul or Stratocaster. If you're looking for that specific sound, it might be better to look at replicas or dedicated models.
Ultimately, the PRS S2 Standard 24 It's a guitar for those who value substance over appearance, build quality over unbridled luxury. It's an instrument that gives you a lot of satisfaction, but you have to be aware of its compromises, which aren't flaws, but specific design choices made to reach a certain price.
My Verdict and Alternatives to Consider
After having dismantled it, played it, and listened to quite a few opinions, it's time to take stock of the PRS S2 Standard 24. My opinion is that it is an excellent guitar, a real workhorse, and a fantastic option for those looking for a made-in-USA PRS experience without having to mortgage their house.
For me, the main strength is the build quality. There's nothing "cheap" about the way this guitar is put together. The wood is good, the finish is meticulous (though not flashy), and the playability is top-notch. The Pattern Thin neck is a real pleasure under the fingers, and the PRS tremolo is one of the best around. I've owned guitars that cost more and had worse quality control, believe me.
The 85/15 “S” pickups? They’re good. They won’t knock you off your chair with their unique character, but they’re versatile, clean, and functional. For most guitarists, they’re more than adequate. If you’re a tone maniac and looking for something more specific, well, that’s an upgrade. And the beauty of having such a solid foundation is that you can afford to make a pickup swap without feeling guilty, knowing you’re investing in a worthy instrument.
So, my final advice is: if your budget is around this price range and you are looking for a versatile, reliable, well-built, USA-made guitar, the PRS S2 Standard 24 It should be at the top of your list. Try it. Feel it under your fingers. It's not the flashiest PRS, but it's a PRS 100% at its core.
Alternatives to consider:
If the S2 Standard 24 isn't entirely convincing, or if you want to explore other options, here are some alternatives worth considering, each with their own pros and cons:
1. *PRS SE Custom
English 
Italiano